|
Forums59
Topics1,039,981
Posts13,973,560
Members144,227
| |
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
|
|
 Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax
[Re: Jman]
#14969353
01/26/24 07:27 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 892
TexasTechliprip
Pro Angler
|
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 892 |
my 6.2 is garbage
2022 with 29K miles and I have blown the engine, new radiator and a boatload of other problems.
Service techs tell me these have been popping like crazy
I would already be in the 3.0 if they were not going to gut me on the trade
|
|
|
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax
[Re: Jman]
#14969981
01/27/24 12:24 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 14,242
Bandit 200 XP
TFF Guru
|
|
TFF Guru
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 14,242 |
I would be pissed if i had 6.2 to do that , sorry to hear that .
Triton 200 XP
200 Yamaha 0X66
|
|
|
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax
[Re: Jman]
#14972954
01/30/24 04:05 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,408
Lone_Wolf
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,408 |
This pro is using the baby duramax as his tow vehicle...
|
|
|
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax
[Re: Jman]
#14982522
02/09/24 01:51 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,408
Lone_Wolf
Extreme Angler
|
|
Extreme Angler
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,408 |
...and a not so positive review
|
|
|
Re: 6.2l L87 vs 3.0l Baby Duramax
[Re: Jman]
#14999805
02/26/24 01:37 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 780
Mark Wendler
Pro Angler
|
|
Pro Angler
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 780 |
Had a 6.2L GMC and went to the 3.0L Baby Duramax in my next GMC. Would make the same decision again without hesitation.
 Bass Club of Fort Worth "The answer to every problem in life is to go fishing. The bigger the problem, the longer the trip"
|
|
Moderated by banker-always fishing, chickenman, Derek 🐝, Duck_Hunter, Fish Killer, J-2, Jacob, Jons3825, JustWingem, Nocona Brian, Toon-Troller, Uncle Zeek, Weekender1
|
![[Linked Image]](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6141/5937816817_f0b40eeff9_m.jpg)
