texasfishingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Champion1996, Mmatula, Mike Buvala, MadDogMooreGPNWA, Jlwatts94
119239 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
hopalong 121,182
TexDawg 120,123
Bigbob_FTW 96,129
John175☮ 85,978
Bob Davis 83,390
Pilothawk 83,292
Mark Perry 72,604
Derek 🐝 68,342
JDavis7873 67,416
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics1,040,535
Posts13,983,061
Members144,239
Most Online39,925
Dec 30th, 2023
Print Thread
terminal question #14732706 05/27/23 01:53 PM
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 39
G
Gtxflyangler Offline OP
Outdoorsman
OP Offline
Outdoorsman
G
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 39
Hi there, Happy Saturday,

For all the much more experienced anglers on here, pros/cons/preference of monofilament vs flourocarbon for tippet? Is there a reason to use one over the other? All i've ever used, even with my conventional fishing tackle, is monofilament. I've had good success, even with decent sized fish, so I'm just wondering if I need to think about adding Floro to my tippet supply.

Happy Angling!

Re: terminal question [Re: Gtxflyangler] #14732729 05/27/23 02:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,661
J
Jim Ford Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
J
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,661
It's been my experience that there is little difference between the two, at least for tippet use. The conventional wisdom is that fluorocarbon sinks better and is more resistant to abrasion, as well as being less visible to the fish. I haven't done any scientific testing, but I've used 12# fluorocarbon tippets (on fluorocarbon leaders) with gurglers tied on #4 hooks, and had no issues with the line sinking my little foam cricket. In random discussions with others I've not found anyone claiming a profound difference between the two when used as tippet material. I've quit buying both and just use fluorocarbon now, but I doubt I'd see any significant differences if I switched to monofilament. I suspect one would see a larger difference between brands than between types. But as I said, all of my data is anecdotal, and perhaps someone has some validated data to refute my opinion.

Re: terminal question [Re: Gtxflyangler] #14733038 05/28/23 01:04 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 18,308
C
COFF Online Content
TFF Guru
Online Content
TFF Guru
C
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 18,308
My experience pretty much mirrors Mr. Ford’s. I find mono slightly more forgiving when tying a knot, but it is pretty easy to learn the knots that work better (or not) with flouro.


Re: terminal question [Re: Gtxflyangler] #14733141 05/28/23 09:50 AM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,092
T
Turf Dawg Offline
Extreme Angler
Offline
Extreme Angler
T
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,092
Depends on how I’m fishing. If I’m in a river with rock fishing nymphs (which is most of what I do) I prefer fluoro . If I’m fishing still water then I’m probably just fishing nylon. It all catches fish so just use whatever you prefer.


Turf Dawg Landscaping
Texas Licensed Irrigator
LI 0020041
Commercial Pesticide Applicator for Turf and Ornamental, Pasture & Rangelands and Right-of-Way
Texas Dept of Agriculture license #0525163
Re: terminal question [Re: Turf Dawg] #14733497 05/28/23 07:51 PM
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 39
G
Gtxflyangler Offline OP
Outdoorsman
OP Offline
Outdoorsman
G
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 39
Thank you sir!!

Re: terminal question [Re: COFF] #14733499 05/28/23 07:51 PM
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 39
G
Gtxflyangler Offline OP
Outdoorsman
OP Offline
Outdoorsman
G
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 39
Thank you sir, appreciate it!!

Re: terminal question [Re: Gtxflyangler] #14747849 06/13/23 02:32 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,752
J
JCG57 Offline
TFF Celebrity
Offline
TFF Celebrity
J
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,752
Mono for small dry flies, fluoro for everything else.

Re: terminal question [Re: JCG57] #14747860 06/13/23 02:38 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,617
M
Mckinneycrappiecatcher Online Content
TFF Celebrity
Online Content
TFF Celebrity
M
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 5,617
Originally Posted by JCG57
Mono for small dry flies, fluoro for everything else.

This. Even in slightly dirty water, fluoro will majorly increase your catch rate with a wet fly or streamer, I’ve proven this through many year of experience, especially with trout streams in clearer water. Fluoro will sink a dry fly though. In trout fishing, the highest I would ever use is 4X for any application, and really the max I use for any application.

Re: terminal question [Re: Gtxflyangler] #14749477 06/14/23 03:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 219
J
jonbo Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
J
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 219
McK., you wouldn't use something like 1x or 2x with streamers?

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 1998-2022 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3